GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs Radeon R9 M375X
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 280M SLI and Radeon R9 M375X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 280M SLI will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M375X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 M375X
GeForce GTX 280M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 280M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 280M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 280M SLI | Radeon R9 M375X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M375X has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 M375X - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon R9 M375X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M375X is 340 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M375X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M375X is 175 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 25% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 31% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 280M SLI and Radeon R9 M375X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Dota 2 is 14% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Fortnite is 23% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 22% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 17% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in World of Tanks is 9% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 280M SLI | Radeon R9 M375X | |
Architecture | G9x | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N10E-GTX | Tropo |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 2 March 2009 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 256 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 585 MHz | 925 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1015 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1508 Million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 40.60 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,299 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 950 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
CUDA | + | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs GeForce GTX 960A
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs Iris Graphics 550
- Radeon R9 M375X vs GeForce GTX 960A
- Radeon R9 M375X vs Iris Graphics 550
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs Radeon HD 5850
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs GeForce GTX 260M SLI
- Radeon R9 M375X vs Radeon HD 5850
- Radeon R9 M375X vs GeForce GTX 260M SLI