GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs Radeon RX Vega 11
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 280M SLI and Radeon RX Vega 11 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 280M SLI will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX Vega 11 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon RX Vega 11
GeForce GTX 280M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 280M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 280M SLI here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 280M SLI | Radeon RX Vega 11 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | IGP | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI has 900% more power consumption, than Radeon RX Vega 11.
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI is used in Laptops, and Radeon RX Vega 11 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 11 - with Vega.
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 11 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 13% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 280M SLI and Radeon RX Vega 11 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Dota 2 is 8% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 14% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Fortnite is 13% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 15% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 7% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Metro Exodus is 11% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 11% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in World of Tanks is 5% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 280M SLI | Radeon RX Vega 11 | |
| Architecture | G9x | Vega |
| Code name | N10E-GTX | Vega Raven Ridge |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 2 March 2009 | 26 October 2017 |
| Pipelines | 256 | 704 |
| Core clock speed | 585 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1240 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1508 Million | 4,940 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 61.60 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,760 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 950 MHz | |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| CUDA | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |