GeForce GTX 285 vs Iris Plus Graphics 650
When comparing GeForce GTX 285 and Iris Plus Graphics 650, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 285 and Iris Plus Graphics 650 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 285
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Power consumption (TDP)
204 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR3
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
32 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 285 has 1260% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
GeForce GTX 285 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 31 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 285.
GeForce GTX 285 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 285 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 285 is 1176 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
GeForce GTX 285 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
7−8
8−9
ultra / 1080p
4−5
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
18−20
medium / 1080p
9−10
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−11
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
30−33
medium / 1080p
12−14
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Battlefield 5 is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 285 and Iris Plus Graphics 650 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
140−150
150−160
medium / 768p
110−120
120−130
ultra / 1080p
55−60
60−65
QHD / 1440p
30−35
35−40
4K / 2160p
27−30
27−30
high / 768p
85−90
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
20−22
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
GeForce GTX 285 and Iris Plus Graphics 650 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
80−85
85−90
medium / 768p
60−65
65−70
ultra / 1080p
35−40
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Dota 2 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
8−9
10−11
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
4K / 2160p
4−5
4−5
low / 720p
20−22
21−24
medium / 1080p
9−10
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Far Cry 5 is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
14−16
16−18
ultra / 1080p
10−12
12−14
low / 720p
60−65
65−70
medium / 1080p
24−27
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Fortnite is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−12
12−14
QHD / 1440p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
27−30
30−35
medium / 1080p
14−16
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Forza Horizon 4 is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
medium / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
12−14
16−18
ultra / 1080p
6−7
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
5−6
5−6
ultra / 1080p
3−4
4−5
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
12−14
14−16
medium / 1080p
7−8
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Metro Exodus is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
95−100
95−100
high / 1080p
90−95
90−95
ultra / 1080p
80−85
85−90
medium / 1080p
90−95
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Minecraft is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
16−18
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
14−16
medium / 1080p
10−12
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
24−27
30−35
medium / 768p
16−18
20−22
high / 1080p
10−11
10−12
ultra / 1080p
6−7
7−8
4K / 2160p
6−7
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
45−50
ultra / 1080p
20−22
21−24
high / 768p
35−40
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 285
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Code name
GT200B
Kaby Lake GT3e
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
23 December 2008
3 January 2017
Pipelines
240
48
Core clock speed
1476 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
51.8 billion/sec
55.20
Floating-point performance
708.5 gflops
883 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
512 Bit
64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1242 MHz
Memory bandwidth
159.0 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
4.0
6.4
OpenGL
2.1
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.1
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.103
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
240
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Quick Sync
+
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)
128bit
Check Price
Check Price
