GeForce GTX 285 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 285 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 285 will be the best choice, for others Iris Pro Graphics 5200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 285
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Power consumption (TDP)
204 Watt
45 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR3
eDRAM
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
128 MB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 285 has 353% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GeForce GTX 285 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 127 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 285.
GeForce GTX 285 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 285 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 285 is 1276 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GeForce GTX 285 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
7−8
9−10
ultra / 1080p
4−5
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
21−24
medium / 1080p
9−10
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−11
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
30−35
medium / 1080p
12−14
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 285 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
140−150
160−170
medium / 768p
110−120
130−140
ultra / 1080p
55−60
65−70
QHD / 1440p
30−35
35−40
4K / 2160p
27−30
27−30
high / 768p
85−90
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
20−22
24−27
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
80−85
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
70−75
ultra / 1080p
35−40
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
8−9
10−12
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−11
4K / 2160p
4−5
4−5
low / 720p
20−22
24−27
medium / 1080p
9−10
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
14−16
18−20
ultra / 1080p
10−12
12−14
low / 720p
60−65
70−75
medium / 1080p
24−27
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
12−14
16−18
ultra / 1080p
10−12
14−16
QHD / 1440p
1−2
3−4
low / 720p
27−30
30−35
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
medium / 768p
45−50
55−60
high / 1080p
12−14
18−20
ultra / 1080p
6−7
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
5−6
6−7
ultra / 1080p
3−4
4−5
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
12−14
18−20
medium / 1080p
7−8
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
95−100
100−110
high / 1080p
90−95
95−100
ultra / 1080p
80−85
85−90
medium / 1080p
90−95
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
16−18
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
40−45
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
16−18
medium / 1080p
10−12
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
24−27
30−35
medium / 768p
16−18
21−24
high / 1080p
10−11
12−14
ultra / 1080p
6−7
7−8
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
50−55
ultra / 1080p
20−22
24−27
high / 768p
35−40
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 285
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Code name
GT200B
Haswell GT3e
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
23 December 2008
5 June 2013
Pipelines
240
40
Core clock speed
1476 MHz
200 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
392 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
22 nm
Texture fill rate
51.8 billion/sec
52.00
Floating-point performance
708.5 gflops
104.0 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
512 Bit
Memory clock speed
1242 MHz
Memory bandwidth
159.0 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
4.0
5.1
OpenGL
2.1
4.3
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.80
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
240
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)
128bit
Check Price
Check Price
