GeForce GTX 285 vs Quadro K620

When comparing GeForce GTX 285 and Quadro K620, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 285 and Quadro K620 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GeForce GTX 285 Check Price

Quadro K620 Check Price

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 285	Quadro K620
Power consumption (TDP)	204 Watt	41 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR3	128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x S-Video	1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTX 285 has 397% more power consumption, than Quadro K620.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro K620 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 285.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 285 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K620 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 285 is 418 MHz higher, than Quadro K620.
GeForce GTX 285 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K620 - by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro K620 is 150 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 285.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K620 is 558 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 285.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	7−8	10−12
ultra / 1080p	4−5	6−7
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	16−18	24−27
medium / 1080p	9−10	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p	12−14	18−20
ultra / 1080p	10−11	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	24−27	40−45
medium / 1080p	12−14	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Battlefield 5 is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GeForce GTX 285 and Quadro K620 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	140−150	180−190
medium / 768p	110−120	150−160
ultra / 1080p	55−60	75−80
QHD / 1440p	30−35	45−50
4K / 2160p	27−30	30−33
high / 768p	85−90	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	20−22	30−35
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p	80−85	95−100
medium / 768p	60−65	80−85
ultra / 1080p	35−40	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Dota 2 is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p	8−9	12−14
ultra / 1080p	8−9	12−14
4K / 2160p	4−5	5−6
low / 720p	20−22	30−33
medium / 1080p	9−10	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p	14−16	20−22
ultra / 1080p	10−12	14−16
low / 720p	60−65	80−85
medium / 1080p	24−27	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Fortnite is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p	12−14	20−22
ultra / 1080p	10−12	16−18
QHD / 1440p	1−2	5−6
low / 720p	27−30	40−45
medium / 1080p	14−16	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Forza Horizon 4 is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
medium / 768p	45−50	60−65
high / 1080p	12−14	21−24
ultra / 1080p	6−7	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Grand Theft Auto V is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p	5−6	7−8
ultra / 1080p	3−4	5−6
4K / 2160p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	12−14	21−24
medium / 1080p	7−8	10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Metro Exodus is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p	95−100	100−110
high / 1080p	90−95	−
ultra / 1080p	80−85	95−100
medium / 1080p	90−95	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p	16−18	20−22
ultra / 1080p	14−16	16−18
low / 720p	30−35	45−50
medium / 1080p	18−20	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	7−8	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	12−14	21−24
medium / 1080p	10−12	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p	24−27	40−45
medium / 768p	16−18	24−27
high / 1080p	10−11	14−16
ultra / 1080p	6−7	9−10
4K / 2160p	6−7	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p	85−90	95−100
medium / 768p	45−50	55−60
ultra / 1080p	20−22	27−30
high / 768p	35−40	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in World of Tanks is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 285.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 285	Quadro K620
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Maxwell
Code name	GT200B	GM107
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	23 December 2008	22 July 2014
Pipelines	240	384
Core clock speed	1476 MHz	1058 MHz
Boost Clock		1124 MHz
Transistor count	1,400 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	51.8 billion/sec	26.98
Floating-point performance	708.5 gflops	863.2 gflops
Length	10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)	160 mm
Memory bus width	512 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1242 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	159.0 GB/s
DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12
Shader Model	4.0	5
OpenGL	2.1	4.5
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	+
CUDA	+	5.0
CUDA cores	240
Height	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options	+
Multi monitor support	+
HDMI	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		104 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays		4
nView Desktop Management		+
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)	128bit
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTX 285 vs Quadro K620

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares