GeForce GTX 285 vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 285 and Radeon PRO WX 2100, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 285 stacks up against Radeon PRO WX 2100, check out specs charts below.
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 285
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Power consumption (TDP)
204 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 285 has 482% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
GeForce GTX 285 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon PRO WX 2100 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 285.
GeForce GTX 285 is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 285 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
GeForce GTX 285 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 4758 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 285.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
7−8
7−8
ultra / 1080p
4−5
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
18−20
medium / 1080p
9−10
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
12−14
12−14
ultra / 1080p
10−11
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
27−30
medium / 1080p
12−14
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Battlefield 5 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 285 and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
140−150
140−150
medium / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
55−60
55−60
QHD / 1440p
30−35
30−35
4K / 2160p
27−30
27−30
high / 768p
85−90
85−90
GeForce GTX 285 and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
20−22
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
GeForce GTX 285 and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
80−85
85−90
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Dota 2 is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
8−9
9−10
ultra / 1080p
8−9
8−9
4K / 2160p
4−5
4−5
low / 720p
20−22
21−24
medium / 1080p
9−10
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Far Cry 5 is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
14−16
16−18
ultra / 1080p
10−12
10−12
low / 720p
60−65
65−70
medium / 1080p
24−27
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Fortnite is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−12
12−14
QHD / 1440p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
27−30
27−30
medium / 1080p
14−16
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
medium / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
6−7
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
5−6
5−6
ultra / 1080p
3−4
3−4
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
14−16
medium / 1080p
7−8
7−8
GeForce GTX 285 and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus.
low / 768p
95−100
95−100
high / 1080p
90−95
90−95
ultra / 1080p
80−85
80−85
medium / 1080p
90−95
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Minecraft is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
16−18
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
14−16
medium / 1080p
10−12
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
24−27
27−30
medium / 768p
16−18
18−20
high / 1080p
10−11
10−11
ultra / 1080p
6−7
7−8
4K / 2160p
6−7
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
85−90
85−90
medium / 768p
45−50
45−50
ultra / 1080p
20−22
21−24
high / 768p
35−40
35−40
GeForce GTX 285 and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 285
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Polaris
Code name
GT200B
Polaris 12
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
23 December 2008
21 March 2018
Pipelines
240
512
Core clock speed
1476 MHz
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
51.8 billion/sec
39.01
Floating-point performance
708.5 gflops
1,248 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
512 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1242 MHz
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
159.0 GB/s
48 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
4.0
6.4
OpenGL
2.1
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
1.2.131
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
CUDA cores
240
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Laptop size
large
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)
128bit
Check Price
Check Price
