FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 285M SLI. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 285M SLI. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9250
GeForce GTX 285M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 285M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 285M SLI here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9250 | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
| Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 150 Watt.
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI has 1 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 285M SLI - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GTX 285M SLI - with G9x.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 49 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
- FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 285M SLI are manufactured by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 966 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 240% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 211% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 74% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Dota 2 is 65% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 260% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Fortnite is 129% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 154% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 90% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Metro Exodus is 325% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Minecraft is 26% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 64% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 166% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in World of Tanks is 44% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9250 | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | G9x |
| Code name | RV770 | N10E-GTX |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 2 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 256 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 576 MHz |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 1508 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 25.00 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |