FireStream 9270 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
When choosing between FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 285M SLI, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
FireStream 9270
GeForce GTX 285M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 285M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 285M SLI here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 6% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
- FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 285M SLI have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 285M SLI - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GTX 285M SLI - with G9x.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 174 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
- FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 285M SLI are manufactured by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 2580 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 115% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 285M SLI have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 69% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Dota 2 is 50% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Fortnite is 92% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 106% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 73% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Metro Exodus is 180% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Minecraft is 26% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 133% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 140% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in World of Tanks is 47% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | G9x |
| Code name | RV770 | N10E-GTX |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 13 November 2008 | 2 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 256 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 576 MHz |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 1508 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.00 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |