FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
When comparing FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 285M SLI, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 285M SLI is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9370
GeForce GTX 285M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 285M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 285M SLI here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 50% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
- FireStream 9370 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 285M SLI - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 285M SLI - with G9x.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 249 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 285M SLI - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 3580 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 7% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 4% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 285M SLI have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 285M SLI have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Dota 2 is 3% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 5% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Fortnite is 2% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 285M SLI have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Minecraft is 5% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 285M SLI have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 6% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 9% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in World of Tanks is 3% more, than FireStream 9370. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | G9x |
Code name | Cypress | N10E-GTX |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 2 March 2009 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 256 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 576 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 1508 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 1020 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |