GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs GRID K260Q
When choosing between GeForce GTX 285M SLI and GRID K260Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 285M SLI and GRID K260Q.
GRID K260Q
GeForce GTX 285M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 285M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 285M SLI here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 285M SLI | GRID K260Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GRID K260Q has 50% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI and GRID K260Q have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI is used in Laptops, and GRID K260Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI is build with G9x architecture, and GRID K260Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K260Q is 169 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GRID K260Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 3980 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 285M SLI and GRID K260Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 200−210 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 170−180 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 130−140 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| GeForce GTX 285M SLI and GRID K260Q have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| GeForce GTX 285M SLI and GRID K260Q have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−105 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 285M SLI | GRID K260Q | |
| Architecture | G9x | Kepler |
| Code name | N10E-GTX | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 2 March 2009 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 256 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 576 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1508 Million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1020 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |