GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs GRID M10 8Q
When comparing GeForce GTX 285M SLI and GRID M10 8Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 285M SLI and GRID M10 8Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID M10 8Q
GeForce GTX 285M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 285M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 285M SLI here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 285M SLI | GRID M10 8Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q has 50% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
- GRID M10 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI is used in Laptops, and GRID M10 8Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI is build with G9x architecture, and GRID M10 8Q - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 457 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GRID M10 8Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 4180 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 7% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| GeForce GTX 285M SLI and GRID M10 8Q have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 285M SLI and GRID M10 8Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 200−210 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 170−180 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 5% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GeForce GTX 285M SLI and GRID M10 8Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Dota 2 is 3% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| GeForce GTX 285M SLI and GRID M10 8Q have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GeForce GTX 285M SLI and GRID M10 8Q have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| GeForce GTX 285M SLI and GRID M10 8Q have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Minecraft is 2% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| GeForce GTX 285M SLI and GRID M10 8Q have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 6% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 9% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−105 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 285M SLI | GRID M10 8Q | |
| Architecture | G9x | Maxwell |
| Code name | N10E-GTX | GM107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 2 March 2009 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 256 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 576 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1508 Million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.24 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1020 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | + | 5.0 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |