GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs Quadro T1000
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 285M SLI and Quadro T1000, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 285M SLI stacks up against Quadro T1000, check out specs charts below.
Quadro T1000
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 285M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 285M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 285M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Quadro T1000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI has 200% more power consumption, than Quadro T1000.
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI is used in Laptops, and Quadro T1000 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI is build with G9x architecture, and Quadro T1000 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 819 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro T1000 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 6980 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 157% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 170% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 200−210 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 170−180 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 130−140 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 161% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 123% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 162% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 102% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 125% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 158% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 100−105 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Quadro T1000 | |
Architecture | G9x | Turing |
Code name | N10E-GTX | TU117 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 2 March 2009 | 27 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 256 | |
Core clock speed | 576 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1508 Million | 4,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 12 nm |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1020 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
CUDA | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |