GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs Radeon R9 M270X
When comparing GeForce GTX 285M SLI and Radeon R9 M270X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 285M SLI and Radeon R9 M270X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R9 M270X
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 285M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 285M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 285M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M270X has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 M270X - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon R9 M270X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M270X is 149 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M270X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M270X is 105 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 88% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 86% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 285M SLI and Radeon R9 M270X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 200−210 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 170−180 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 61% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Dota 2 is 56% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Fortnite is 66% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 65% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Metro Exodus is 133% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Minecraft is 21% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 77% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−105 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in World of Tanks is 34% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Architecture | G9x | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N10E-GTX | Venus |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 2 March 2009 | 21 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 256 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 576 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 775 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1508 Million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1020 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
CUDA | + | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs Radeon HD 6990M
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs FireStream 9370
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Radeon HD 6990M
- Radeon R9 M270X vs FireStream 9370
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs Radeon R7 M370
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Radeon R7 M370