FirePro M5950 vs GeForce GTX 295
When choosing between FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTX 295, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTX 295.
GeForce GTX 295
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M5950 | GeForce GTX 295 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 289 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1792 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 725% more power consumption, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and GeForce GTX 295 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1791 GB more memory, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTX 295 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 295 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 517 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 295 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 99 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Battlefield 5 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Dota 2 is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTX 295 have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Fortnite is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Forza Horizon 4 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTX 295 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Minecraft is 3% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTX 295 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M5950 | GeForce GTX 295 | |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Whistler-XT | GT200B |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 13 April 2011 | 8 January 2009 |
| Pipelines | 480 | 240 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 1242 MHz |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.40 | 92.2 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | 2x 596.2 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 896 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 999 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57 GB/s | 223.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 67 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
| Check Price |