FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GTX 295
When choosing between FirePro W7100 and GeForce GTX 295, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W7100 and GeForce GTX 295.
FirePro W7100
GeForce GTX 295
Main Specs
| FirePro W7100 | GeForce GTX 295 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | 289 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 6-pin & 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1792 MB |
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI |
- FirePro W7100 has 38% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 295.
- FirePro W7100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 295 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1784 GB more memory, than FirePro W7100.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro W7100 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 295 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 322 MHz higher, than FirePro W7100.
- FirePro W7100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 295 - by 55 nm process technology.
- FirePro W7100 is 231 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 295.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W7100 is 4001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Battlefield 5 is 545% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than FirePro W7100. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Dota 2 is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Far Cry 5 is 585% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Fortnite is 363% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 550% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 315% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 630% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W7100 | GeForce GTX 295 | |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Tonga | GT200B |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 12 August 2014 | 8 January 2009 |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 240 |
| Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 1242 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 103.0 | 92.2 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 3,297 gflops | 2x 596.2 gflops |
| Length | 241 mm | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 896 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 999 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 223.8 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 362 Mh/s | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |