FireStream 9270 vs GeForce GTX 295
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 295. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 295. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9270
GeForce GTX 295
Main Specs
| FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 295 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 289 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 6-pin & 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1792 MB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 80% more power consumption, than FireStream 9270.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1790 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GTX 295 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 492 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 295 are manufactured by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 2601 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Battlefield 5 is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Dota 2 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Far Cry 5 is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Fortnite is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Grand Theft Auto V is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Minecraft is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in World of Tanks is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 295 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | RV770 | GT200B |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 13 November 2008 | 8 January 2009 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 240 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 1242 MHz |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 92.2 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 2x 596.2 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 896 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 999 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 223.8 GB/s |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |