FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 295
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 295, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FireStream 9370 stacks up against GeForce GTX 295, check out specs charts below.
FireStream 9370
GeForce GTX 295
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 295 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 289 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 6-pin & 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1792 MB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 28% more power consumption, than FireStream 9370.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1788 GB more memory, than FireStream 9370.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 295 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 417 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 295 - by 55 nm process technology.
- FireStream 9370 is 257 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 295.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 3601 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 163% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 295 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 74% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 59% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 95% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 158% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 85% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 112% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 295 | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Cypress | GT200B |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 8 January 2009 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 240 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 1242 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 92.2 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 2x 596.2 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 896 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 999 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 223.8 GB/s |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- FireStream 9370 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- FireStream 9370 vs Radeon R9 M275
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M275