GeForce 8800 GTX vs GeForce GTX 295
In this comparison between GeForce 8800 GTX and GeForce GTX 295 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 8800 GTX will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 295 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 8800 GTX
GeForce GTX 295
Main Specs
GeForce 8800 GTX | GeForce GTX 295 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 155 Watt | 289 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 6-pin & 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 768 MB | 1792 MB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 86% more power consumption, than GeForce 8800 GTX.
- GeForce 8800 GTX is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 295 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1024 GB more memory, than GeForce 8800 GTX.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce 8800 GTX is build with Tesla architecture, and GeForce GTX 295 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 666 MHz higher, than GeForce 8800 GTX.
- GeForce 8800 GTX is manufactured by 90 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 295 - by 55 nm process technology.
- GeForce 8800 GTX is 260 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 295.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 99 MHz higher, than GeForce 8800 GTX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800 GTX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 189% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Dota 2 is 124% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Fortnite is 136% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Minecraft is 64% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | − | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in World of Tanks is 88% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. |
Full Specs
GeForce 8800 GTX | GeForce GTX 295 | |
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | G80 | GT200B |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | 8 November 2006 | 8 January 2009 |
Pipelines | 128 | 240 |
Core clock speed | 576 MHz | 1242 MHz |
Transistor count | 681 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 36.8 billion/sec | 92.2 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 345.6 gflops | 2x 596.2 gflops |
Length | 270 mm | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 896 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 999 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | 223.8 GB/s |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 575 | 480 |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | + |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |