GeForce 8800M GTX SLI vs GeForce GTX 295
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce 8800M GTX SLI and GeForce GTX 295. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce 8800M GTX SLI and GeForce GTX 295. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 295
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 8800M GTX SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI | GeForce GTX 295 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 289 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 1792 MB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 122% more power consumption, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1280 GB more memory, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
- GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 295 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is build with G9x architecture, and GeForce GTX 295 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 742 MHz higher, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
- GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 295 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 199 MHz higher, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800M GTX SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800M GTX SLI in Battlefield 5 is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800M GTX SLI in Call of Duty: Warzone is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800M GTX SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GeForce 8800M GTX SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800M GTX SLI in Dota 2 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800M GTX SLI in Far Cry 5 is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800M GTX SLI in Fortnite is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800M GTX SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800M GTX SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800M GTX SLI in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800M GTX SLI in Minecraft is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800M GTX SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800M GTX SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800M GTX SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800M GTX SLI in World of Tanks is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI | GeForce GTX 295 | |
Architecture | G9x | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | NB8E-GTX | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 19 November 2007 | 8 January 2009 |
Pipelines | 192 | 240 |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 1242 MHz |
Transistor count | 1508 Million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 896 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 999 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 2.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | large | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce 8800M GTX SLI vs Radeon HD 8770M
- GeForce 8800M GTX SLI vs GeForce GTX 275
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 8770M
- GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GTX 275
- GeForce 8800M GTX SLI vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce 8800M GTX SLI vs Radeon R9 M275
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M275