GeForce 9800 GTX vs GeForce GTX 295
When choosing between GeForce 9800 GTX and GeForce GTX 295, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 9800 GTX and GeForce GTX 295.
GeForce 9800 GTX
GeForce GTX 295
Main Specs
GeForce 9800 GTX | GeForce GTX 295 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | 289 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 6-pin & 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 1792 MB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 106% more power consumption, than GeForce 9800 GTX.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1280 GB more memory, than GeForce 9800 GTX.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is build with Tesla architecture, and GeForce GTX 295 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 9800 GTX is 446 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 295 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Both graphics cards are the same length of 10 mm.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 9800 GTX is 101 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800 GTX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 189% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Dota 2 is 124% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Fortnite is 136% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Minecraft is 64% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | − | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in World of Tanks is 88% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. |
Full Specs
GeForce 9800 GTX | GeForce GTX 295 | |
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | G92 | GT200B |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | 28 March 2008 | 8 January 2009 |
Pipelines | 128 | 240 |
Core clock speed | 1688 MHz | 1242 MHz |
Transistor count | 754 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.2 billion/sec | 92.2 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 432.1 gflops | 2x 596.2 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 896 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | 999 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 70.4 GB/s | 223.8 GB/s |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 128 | 480 |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) |
SLI options | + | + |
Multi monitor support | + | + |
HDMI | Via Adapter | + |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | S/PDIF |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |