GeForce 9800M GT SLI vs GeForce GTX 295
When choosing between GeForce 9800M GT SLI and GeForce GTX 295, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 9800M GT SLI and GeForce GTX 295.
GeForce GTX 295
GeForce 9800M GT SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 9800M GT SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 9800M GT SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce 9800M GT SLI | GeForce GTX 295 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 289 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 1792 MB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 122% more power consumption, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1280 GB more memory, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
- GeForce 9800M GT SLI is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 295 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 9800M GT SLI is build with G9x architecture, and GeForce GTX 295 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 742 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
- GeForce 9800M GT SLI is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 295 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 199 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Battlefield 5 is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Call of Duty: Warzone is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 100−105 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Dota 2 is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Far Cry 5 is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Fortnite is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Minecraft is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in World of Tanks is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce 9800M GT SLI | GeForce GTX 295 | |
Architecture | G9x | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | NB9E-GT2 | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 15 July 2008 | 8 January 2009 |
Pipelines | 192 | 240 |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 1242 MHz |
Transistor count | 1508 Million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 896 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 999 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 2.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | + |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | large | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce 9800M GT SLI vs FirePro M7740
- GeForce 9800M GT SLI vs GeForce 9800M GTS SLI
- GeForce GTX 295 vs FirePro M7740
- GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce 9800M GTS SLI
- GeForce 9800M GT SLI vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce 9800M GT SLI vs Radeon R9 M275
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M275