GeForce GT 645M vs GeForce GTX 295
When choosing between GeForce GT 645M and GeForce GTX 295, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GT 645M and GeForce GTX 295.
GeForce GTX 295
GeForce GT 645M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 645M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 645M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 645M | GeForce GTX 295 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 32 Watt | 289 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3\GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1792 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 803% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 645M.
- GeForce GT 645M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 295 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1790 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 645M.
- GeForce GT 645M is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 295 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 645M is build with Kepler architecture, and GeForce GTX 295 - with Tesla 2.0.
- GeForce GT 645M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 295 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 645M is 801 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Battlefield 5 is 57% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 645M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Dota 2 is 13% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Far Cry 5 is 80% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Fortnite is 25% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Grand Theft Auto V is 23% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Metro Exodus is 150% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than GeForce GT 645M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 645M | GeForce GTX 295 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | N13P-GS | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 22 March 2012 | 8 January 2009 |
Pipelines | 384 | 240 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 22.7 billion/sec | 92.2 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 544.5 gflops | 2x 596.2 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 128bit | 896 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 999 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 384 | 480 |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | + |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
3D Blu-Ray | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 19 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GT 645M vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- GeForce GT 645M vs Quadro CX
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Quadro CX
- GeForce GT 645M vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GT 645M vs Radeon R9 M275
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M275