GeForce GT 730M vs GeForce GTX 295
When comparing GeForce GT 730M and GeForce GTX 295, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GT 730M and GeForce GTX 295 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 295
GeForce GT 730M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 730M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 730M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 730M | GeForce GTX 295 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 289 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1792 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 775% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 730M.
- GeForce GT 730M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 295 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1788 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 730M.
- GeForce GT 730M is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 295 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 730M is build with Kepler architecture, and GeForce GTX 295 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 517 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 730M.
- GeForce GT 730M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 295 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 730M is 801 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Battlefield 5 is 120% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 730M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Fortnite is 31% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Grand Theft Auto V is 30% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 166% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
low / 768p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than GeForce GT 730M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 730M | GeForce GTX 295 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GK107 | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 January 2013 | 8 January 2009 |
Pipelines | 384 | 240 |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 1242 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 23.20 | 92.2 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 552.2 gflops | 2x 596.2 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 896 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 - 2000 MHz | 999 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 223.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | + |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3/GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |