GeForce GT 750M vs GeForce GTX 295
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GT 750M and GeForce GTX 295. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GT 750M and GeForce GTX 295. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 295
GeForce GT 750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 750M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 750M | GeForce GTX 295 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 289 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1792 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 478% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 750M.
- GeForce GT 750M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 295 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1788 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 750M.
- GeForce GT 750M is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 295 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 750M is build with Kepler architecture, and GeForce GTX 295 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 275 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 750M.
- GeForce GT 750M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 295 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 750M is 1001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Battlefield 5 is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Dota 2 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Far Cry 5 is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Fortnite is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Grand Theft Auto V is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Minecraft is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in World of Tanks is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 750M | GeForce GTX 295 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | N14P-GT | GT200B |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 April 2013 | 8 January 2009 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 240 |
| Core clock speed | 967 MHz | 1242 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 967 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.94 | 92.2 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 742.7 gflops | 2x 596.2 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 896 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 - 5000 MHz | 999 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB/s | 223.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | + |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | + |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3/GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
| Check Price |