GeForce GT 750M SLI vs GeForce GTX 295
When comparing GeForce GT 750M SLI and GeForce GTX 295, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GT 750M SLI and GeForce GTX 295 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 295
GeForce GT 750M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 750M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 750M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 750M SLI | GeForce GTX 295 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 2 GB | 1792 MB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1790 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 750M SLI.
- GeForce GT 750M SLI is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 295 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 750M SLI is build with Kepler architecture, and GeForce GTX 295 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 275 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 750M SLI.
- GeForce GT 750M SLI is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 295 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 750M SLI is 1001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GT 750M SLI and GeForce GTX 295 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 200−210 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 170−180 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 130−140 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 87% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Dota 2 is 65% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 185% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Fortnite is 118% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 191% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 105% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Metro Exodus is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Minecraft is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 137% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in World of Tanks is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 750M SLI | GeForce GTX 295 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | N14P-GT | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 April 2013 | 8 January 2009 |
Pipelines | 768 | 240 |
Core clock speed | 967 MHz | 1242 MHz |
Transistor count | 1300 Million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 2x 128 Bit | 896 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 - 5000 MHz | 999 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 2.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | large | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |