GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs GeForce GTX 295
When comparing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and GeForce GTX 295, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and GeForce GTX 295 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GeForce GTX 295
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | GeForce GTX 295 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 289 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin & 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 285% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 295 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is build with Turing architecture, and GeForce GTX 295 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 288 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 295 - by 55 nm process technology.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 219 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 295.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 7001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−12 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 633% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 20−22 | − |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 609% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 193% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Dota 2 is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 642% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 190−200 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 400% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 608% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | − |
| high / 1080p | 75−80 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 330% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Metro Exodus is 925% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 462% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 690% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | GeForce GTX 295 | |
| Architecture | Turing | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | TU117 | GT200B |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | no data | 8 January 2009 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 240 |
| Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 1242 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,700 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
| Length | 229 mm | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 896 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 999 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | |
| DirectX | 12_1 | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |