GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 295
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and GeForce GTX 295, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q stacks up against GeForce GTX 295, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 295
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | GeForce GTX 295 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 289 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin & 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1792 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 478% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 295 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1788 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 295 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is build with Turing architecture, and GeForce GTX 295 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 207 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 295 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 9001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 545% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Dota 2 is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 585% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Fortnite is 363% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 550% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 315% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 630% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in World of Tanks is 71% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | GeForce GTX 295 | |
Architecture | Turing | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | N18P-G62 Max-Q | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 2 April 2020 | 8 January 2009 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 240 |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 1242 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.80 | 92.2 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 896 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz | 999 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 223.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.140 | N/A |
CUDA | 7.5 | + |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 960
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GTX 960
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon R9 M275
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M275