GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and GeForce GTX 460 768MB, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 295 stacks up against GeForce GTX 460 768MB, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 295
GeForce GTX 460 768MB
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | GeForce GTX 460 768MB | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | |
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 460 768MB - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 567 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 768MB is 801 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Battlefield 5 is 145% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 295 and GeForce GTX 460 768MB have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 67% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Dota 2 is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Far Cry 5 is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Fortnite is 90% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Forza Horizon 4 is 141% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Grand Theft Auto V is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 130% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 768MB in World of Tanks is 48% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | GeForce GTX 460 768MB | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GT200B | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | 8 January 2009 | no data |
Pipelines | 240 | 336 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 675 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 11 |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 2.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M275
- GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs Radeon R9 M275
- GeForce GTX 295 vs FireStream 9370
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M470
- GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs FireStream 9370
- GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs Radeon R9 M470