GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GTX 560M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and GeForce GTX 560M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 295 stacks up against GeForce GTX 560M, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 295
GeForce GTX 560M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 560M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 560M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | GeForce GTX 560M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 1536 MB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 285% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 560M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 560M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 256 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 560M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 560M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 560M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 467 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 560M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 560M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 560M is 251 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Battlefield 5 is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Dota 2 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Far Cry 5 is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Fortnite is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Grand Theft Auto V is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Minecraft is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in World of Tanks is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | GeForce GTX 560M | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GT200B | N12E-GS |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 8 January 2009 | 30 May 2011 |
Pipelines | 240 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 775 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,170 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 24.8 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 595.2 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 480 | 192 |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | 2-way |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
3D Blu-Ray | + | |
3D Gaming | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 44 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |