GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GTX 580M
When comparing GeForce GTX 295 and GeForce GTX 580M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and GeForce GTX 580M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 295
GeForce GTX 580M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 580M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 580M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | GeForce GTX 580M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 2 MB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 189% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 580M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 580M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1790 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 580M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 580M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 580M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 622 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 580M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 580M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 580M is 501 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580M in Battlefield 5 is 136% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 295 and GeForce GTX 580M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 62% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 580M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580M in Dota 2 is 48% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580M in Far Cry 5 is 128% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580M in Fortnite is 81% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580M in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580M in Grand Theft Auto V is 70% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580M in Metro Exodus is 175% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580M in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 87% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 130% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580M in World of Tanks is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | GeForce GTX 580M | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GT200B | N12E-GTX2 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 8 January 2009 | 28 June 2011 |
Pipelines | 240 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 620 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 39.7 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 952.3 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 96.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 480 | 384 |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | + |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
3D Blu-Ray | + | |
3D Gaming | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 40 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |