GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GTX 670MX SLI
When choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and GeForce GTX 670MX SLI, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 295 and GeForce GTX 670MX SLI.
GeForce GTX 295
GeForce GTX 670MX SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670MX SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670MX SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | GeForce GTX 670MX SLI | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 92% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 670MX SLI.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 670MX SLI - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 670MX SLI - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 642 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670MX SLI.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 670MX SLI - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI is 1801 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 350% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Battlefield 5 is 354% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 130−140 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 146% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Dota 2 is 109% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Far Cry 5 is 342% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Fortnite is 218% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 333% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | − | 100−105 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Minecraft is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 225% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 350% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in World of Tanks is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | GeForce GTX 670MX SLI | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GT200B | N13E-GR |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 8 January 2009 | 1 October 2012 |
Pipelines | 240 | 1920 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 600 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 5080 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 2x 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 2800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 11, Shader 5.1 |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 2.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | + |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M275
- GeForce GTX 670MX SLI vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GTX 670MX SLI vs Radeon R9 M275
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 370
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon Pro Vega 16
- GeForce GTX 670MX SLI vs Radeon R9 370
- GeForce GTX 670MX SLI vs Radeon Pro Vega 16