GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GTX 680MX
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 295 and GeForce GTX 680MX you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 295 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 680MX will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 295
GeForce GTX 680MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 680MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 680MX here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | GeForce GTX 680MX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 122 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 136% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 680MX.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1790 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 680MX.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 680MX - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 680MX - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 522 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 680MX.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 680MX - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 680MX is 1501 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−33 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Battlefield 5 is 336% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 141% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Dota 2 is 105% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Far Cry 5 is 328% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Fortnite is 213% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Forza Horizon 4 is 316% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | − | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Grand Theft Auto V is 175% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Metro Exodus is 425% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Minecraft is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 225% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 340% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in World of Tanks is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | GeForce GTX 680MX | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GT200B | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 8 January 2009 | 23 October 2012 |
Pipelines | 240 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 720 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 3540 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 92.2 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 2500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 160 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 480 | 1536 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | + |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
3D Vision | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 57 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |