GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GTX 760M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 295 and GeForce GTX 760M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and GeForce GTX 760M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 295
GeForce GTX 760M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 760M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 760M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | GeForce GTX 760M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 425% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 760M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1790 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 760M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 760M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 585 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 760M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760M is 1001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Battlefield 5 is 63% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Dota 2 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Far Cry 5 is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Fortnite is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Grand Theft Auto V is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Minecraft is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in World of Tanks is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | GeForce GTX 760M | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | GT200B | N14E-GL |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 8 January 2009 | 30 May 2013 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 657 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 2,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 42.05 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 1,009 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 64.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 API |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | + |
| CUDA cores | 480 | 768 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | + |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | + |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 54 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
| Check Price |