GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GTX 765M
When choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and GeForce GTX 765M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 295 and GeForce GTX 765M.
GeForce GTX 295
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 765M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 765M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 765M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | GeForce GTX 765M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 285% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 765M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 765M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1790 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 765M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 765M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 765M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 392 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 765M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 765M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 765M is 1001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Battlefield 5 is 109% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 295 and GeForce GTX 765M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Dota 2 is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Far Cry 5 is 85% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Fortnite is 59% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Grand Theft Auto V is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Minecraft is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 62% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in World of Tanks is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | GeForce GTX 765M | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GT200B | N14-GE |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 8 January 2009 | 30 May 2013 |
Pipelines | 240 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 850 MHz |
Boost Clock | 863 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 2,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 55.23 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 1,326 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 64.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 480 | 768 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | + |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | + |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 24 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |