GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GTX 775M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and GeForce GTX 775M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 295 stacks up against GeForce GTX 775M, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 295
GeForce GTX 775M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 775M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 775M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | GeForce GTX 775M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 189% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 775M.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1788 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 775M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 775M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 775M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 523 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 775M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 775M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 775M is 2601 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−33 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Battlefield 5 is 327% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 95−100 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 140% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Dota 2 is 105% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Far Cry 5 is 328% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Fortnite is 213% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Forza Horizon 4 is 316% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | − | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Grand Theft Auto V is 175% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Metro Exodus is 425% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Minecraft is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 225% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 330% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in World of Tanks is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | GeForce GTX 775M | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GT200B | N13E-GTX-A2 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 8 January 2009 | 24 September 2013 |
Pipelines | 240 | 1344 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 719 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 3540 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 2.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | + |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |