GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GTX 880M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 295 and GeForce GTX 880M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and GeForce GTX 880M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 295
GeForce GTX 880M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 880M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 880M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | GeForce GTX 880M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 122 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 136% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 880M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 880M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1784 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 880M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 880M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 880M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 288 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 880M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 880M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 90−95 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 133% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Dota 2 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Fortnite is 186% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Forza Horizon 4 is 291% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Grand Theft Auto V is 170% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Metro Exodus is 425% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Minecraft is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 310% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in World of Tanks is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | GeForce GTX 880M | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GT200B | N15E-GX-A2 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 8 January 2009 | 12 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 240 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 954 MHz |
Boost Clock | 993 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 127.1 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 3,050 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 480 | 1536 |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | + |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | + |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 96 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M275
- GeForce GTX 880M vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GTX 880M vs Radeon R9 M275
- GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GTX 780M
- GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q
- GeForce GTX 880M vs GeForce GTX 780M
- GeForce GTX 880M vs GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q