GeForce GTX 295 vs GRID K260Q

When choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and GRID K260Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 295 and GRID K260Q.

GeForce GTX 295

GRID K260Q

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 295	GRID K260Q
Power consumption (TDP)	289 Watt	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	6-pin & 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1792 MB	2 GB
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI	No outputs

GeForce GTX 295 has 28% more power consumption, than GRID K260Q.
GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K260Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GeForce GTX 295 has 1790 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and GRID K260Q - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 497 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GRID K260Q - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 4001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	3−4	14−16
ultra / 1080p	2−3	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	14−16	30−35
medium / 1080p	5−6	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	7−8	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	18−20	50−55
medium / 1080p	8−9	27−30
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 209% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	30−35	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GeForce GTX 295 and GRID K260Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	120−130	210−220
medium / 768p	90−95	180−190
ultra / 1080p	40−45	95−100
QHD / 1440p	24−27	50−55
4K / 2160p	18−20	30−33
high / 768p	65−70	140−150
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 95% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
low / 768p	80−85	55−60
ultra / 1080p	14−16	40−45
medium / 1080p	40−45	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
medium / 768p	50−55	90−95
ultra / 1080p	27−30	60−65
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 73% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
high / 1080p	5−6	18−20
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	2−3	6−7
low / 720p	14−16	35−40
medium / 1080p	6−7	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 185% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
high / 1080p	12−14	24−27
ultra / 1080p	7−8	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
low / 720p	50−55	95−100
medium / 1080p	14−16	50−55
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 118% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
high / 1080p	7−8	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	20−22
QHD / 1440p	0−1	9−10
low / 720p	20−22	50−55
medium / 1080p	9−10	27−30
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 191% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
low / 768p	45−50	85−90
medium / 768p	−	75−80
high / 1080p	8−9	30−33
ultra / 1080p	5−6	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
medium / 720p	40−45	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 120% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
high / 1080p	3−4	9−10
ultra / 1080p	1−2	7−8
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	8−9	27−30
medium / 1080p	4−5	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
low / 768p	85−90	110−120
high / 1080p	85−90	−
ultra / 1080p	80−85	100−110
medium / 1080p	85−90	100−110
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	12−14	18−20
low / 720p	27−30	55−60
medium / 1080p	14−16	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	7−8	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	8−9	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 137% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
low / 768p	16−18	55−60
medium / 768p	12−14	30−35
high / 1080p	6−7	18−20
ultra / 1080p	5−6	10−12
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
low / 768p	70−75	100−110
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	16−18	35−40
high / 768p	30−35	50−55
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 295.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 295	GRID K260Q
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Kepler
Code name	GT200B	GK104
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	8 January 2009	28 June 2013
Pipelines	240	1536
Core clock speed	1242 MHz	745 MHz
Transistor count	1,400 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	92.2 billion/sec	95.36
Floating-point performance	2x 596.2 gflops	2,289 gflops
Length	10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width	896 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	999 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	223.8 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	4.0	5.1
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA	+	3.0
CUDA cores	480
Height	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options	+
Multi monitor support	+
HDMI	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF
CUDA cores per GPU	240
Standard memory config per GPU	896 MB
Memory interface width per GPU	448 Bit
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)	128bit

GeForce GTX 295 vs GRID K260Q

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares