GeForce GTX 295 vs GRID M60 1Q
When comparing GeForce GTX 295 and GRID M60 1Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and GRID M60 1Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 295
GRID M60 1Q
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | GRID M60 1Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 28% more power consumption, than GRID M60 1Q.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID M60 1Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1791 GB more memory, than GRID M60 1Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and GRID M60 1Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 685 MHz higher, than GRID M60 1Q.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GRID M60 1Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- GRID M60 1Q is 257 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 295.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 1Q is 4013 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Battlefield 5 is 327% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 100−105 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 170−180 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 141% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Dota 2 is 105% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Far Cry 5 is 328% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Fortnite is 213% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 316% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | − | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 175% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Metro Exodus is 425% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Minecraft is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 225% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 340% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in World of Tanks is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | GRID M60 1Q | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | GT200B | GM204 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 8 January 2009 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 150.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 4,833 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | 267 mm |
| Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 5.2 |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |