GeForce GTX 295 vs HD Graphics 5000
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 295 and HD Graphics 5000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 295 will be the best choice, for others HD Graphics 5000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 295
HD Graphics 5000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 5000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 5000 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | HD Graphics 5000 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 863% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 5000.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and HD Graphics 5000 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and HD Graphics 5000 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and HD Graphics 5000 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 1042 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 5000.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and HD Graphics 5000 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Battlefield 5 is 120% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 5000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Dota 2 is 20% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Fortnite is 31% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Forza Horizon 4 is 71% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Grand Theft Auto V is 39% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Minecraft is 7% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 166% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | − |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 266% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in World of Tanks is 14% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | HD Graphics 5000 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
| Code name | GT200B | Haswell GT3 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 8 January 2009 | 5 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 40 |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,300 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 22 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 44.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.80 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
| Check Price |