GeForce GTX 295 vs HD Graphics P530
When comparing GeForce GTX 295 and HD Graphics P530, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and HD Graphics P530 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 295
HD Graphics P530 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics P530 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics P530 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | HD Graphics P530 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 1740 MB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1826% more power consumption, than HD Graphics P530.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and HD Graphics P530 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 52 GB more memory, than HD Graphics P530.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and HD Graphics P530 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and HD Graphics P530 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 892 MHz higher, than HD Graphics P530.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and HD Graphics P530 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than HD Graphics P530. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than HD Graphics P530. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P530 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than HD Graphics P530. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P530 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Dota 2 is 1% more, than HD Graphics P530. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Far Cry 5 is 40% more, than HD Graphics P530. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Fortnite is 4% more, than HD Graphics P530. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Forza Horizon 4 is 20% more, than HD Graphics P530. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than HD Graphics P530. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than HD Graphics P530. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| GeForce GTX 295 and HD Graphics P530 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| GeForce GTX 295 and HD Graphics P530 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than HD Graphics P530. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than HD Graphics P530. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P530 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | HD Graphics P530 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Gen. 9 Skylake |
| Code name | GT200B | Skylake GT2 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 8 January 2009 | 1 September 2015 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 24 |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 18.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.97 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
| Check Price |