GeForce GTX 295 vs Iris Graphics 5100
When comparing GeForce GTX 295 and Iris Graphics 5100, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Iris Graphics 5100 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 295
Iris Graphics 5100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 5100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 5100 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Iris Graphics 5100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 30 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 863% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Graphics 5100 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 5100 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Iris Graphics 5100 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 1042 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 5100 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
GeForce GTX 295 and Iris Graphics 5100 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
GeForce GTX 295 and Iris Graphics 5100 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Dota 2 is 1% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
GeForce GTX 295 and Iris Graphics 5100 have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
GeForce GTX 295 and Iris Graphics 5100 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
GeForce GTX 295 and Iris Graphics 5100 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
GeForce GTX 295 and Iris Graphics 5100 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in World of Tanks is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Iris Graphics 5100 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
Code name | GT200B | Haswell GT3 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 8 January 2009 | 5 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 240 | 40 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 200 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,300 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 22 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 48.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.80 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Quick Sync | + | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M275
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs Radeon R9 M275
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Quadro 3000M
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4850
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs Quadro 3000M
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4850