GeForce GTX 295 vs Iris Plus Graphics 640
When comparing GeForce GTX 295 and Iris Plus Graphics 640, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Iris Plus Graphics 640 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 295
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 32 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1826% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1760 GB more memory, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 942 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Battlefield 5 is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Dota 2 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Far Cry 5 is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Fortnite is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Forza Horizon 4 is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Minecraft is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in World of Tanks is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
Code name | GT200B | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 8 January 2009 | 3 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 240 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 52.80 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.103 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Quick Sync | + | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M275
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Radeon R9 M275
- GeForce GTX 295 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GTX 660M
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce GTX 660M