GeForce GTX 295 vs Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 295 and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 295
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 942 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Battlefield 5 is 172% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 295 and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 85% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Dota 2 is 65% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Far Cry 5 is 171% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Fortnite is 104% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Forza Horizon 4 is 166% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Metro Exodus is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Minecraft is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 112% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in World of Tanks is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | GT200B | Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 8 January 2009 | 28 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 240 | 64 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 2.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Quick Sync | + | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M275
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs Radeon R9 M275
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R7 360
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 7790
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs Radeon R7 360
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs Radeon HD 7790