GeForce GTX 295 vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
When comparing GeForce GTX 295 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 295
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1826% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 942 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
GeForce GTX 295 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
GeForce GTX 295 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Dota 2 is 8% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
GeForce GTX 295 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
GeForce GTX 295 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Grand Theft Auto V is 11% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Minecraft is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
GeForce GTX 295 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
GeForce GTX 295 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Gen. 8 Broadwell |
Code name | GT200B | Broadwell GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 8 January 2009 | 2 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 240 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 40.80 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 883.2 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.80 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M275
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon R9 M275
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2