GeForce GTX 295 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 295 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 295 will be the best choice, for others Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 295
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 842 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Battlefield 5 is 345% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 141% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Cyberpunk 2077 is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 109% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Far Cry 5 is 342% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 213% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Forza Horizon 4 is 333% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | − | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Metro Exodus is 450% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 225% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 350% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in World of Tanks is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | GT200B | Tiger Lake Xe |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 8 January 2009 | 15 August 2020 |
Pipelines | 240 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 400 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 2.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Quick Sync | + | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M275
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M275
- GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M395
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M395