GeForce GTX 295 vs Quadro K1100M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 295 and Quadro K1100M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 295 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K1100M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 295
Quadro K1100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K1100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1100M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Quadro K1100M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 542% more power consumption, than Quadro K1100M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K1100M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1790 GB more memory, than Quadro K1100M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K1100M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K1100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 537 MHz higher, than Quadro K1100M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K1100M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K1100M is 1801 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 25% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 1% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Dota 2 is 4% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Far Cry 5 is 80% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Fortnite is 10% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Forza Horizon 4 is 9% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in World of Tanks is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Quadro K1100M | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | GT200B | GK107 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 8 January 2009 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 705 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 22.59 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 542.2 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 44.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | + |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
| Check Price |