GeForce GTX 295 vs Quadro K2000M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 295 and Quadro K2000M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Quadro K2000M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 295
Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Quadro K2000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 425% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1790 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K2000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K2000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 497 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K2000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K2000M is 801 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 1% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Dota 2 is 10% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Far Cry 5 is 80% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Fortnite is 15% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Forza Horizon 4 is 20% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Grand Theft Auto V is 18% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| GeForce GTX 295 and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| GeForce GTX 295 and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in World of Tanks is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Quadro K2000M | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | GT200B | N14P-Q3 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 8 January 2009 | 1 June 2012 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 23.84 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 572.2 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | + |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
| Check Price |