GeForce GTX 295 vs Quadro K2100M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Quadro K2100M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 295 stacks up against Quadro K2100M, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 295
Quadro K2100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2100M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Quadro K2100M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 425% more power consumption, than Quadro K2100M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K2100M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1790 GB more memory, than Quadro K2100M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K2100M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K2100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 575 MHz higher, than Quadro K2100M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K2100M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K2100M is 2001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Battlefield 5 is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Dota 2 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Far Cry 5 is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Fortnite is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Minecraft is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in World of Tanks is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Quadro K2100M | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | GT200B | GK106 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 8 January 2009 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 576 |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 667 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 2,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 32.02 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 768.4 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 48.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | + |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 38 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
| Check Price |