GeForce GTX 295 vs Quadro K2200M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 295 and Quadro K2200M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 295 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K2200M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 295
Quadro K2200M
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Quadro K2200M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 344% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1790 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 575 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K2200M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 4013 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 96% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 285% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 186% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 275% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 170% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Quadro K2200M | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | GT200B | GM107 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 8 January 2009 | 19 July 2014 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 667 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 26.68 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 853.8 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 5.0 |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |