GeForce GTX 295 vs Quadro K4200

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 295 and Quadro K4200. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Quadro K4200. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

GeForce GTX 295

Quadro K4200 Check Price

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 295	Quadro K4200
Power consumption (TDP)	289 Watt	108 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	6-pin & 8-pin	1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1792 MB	4 GB
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
		Check Price

GeForce GTX 295 has 167% more power consumption, than Quadro K4200.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
GeForce GTX 295 has 1788 GB more memory, than Quadro K4200.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K4200 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 471 MHz higher, than Quadro K4200.
GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K4200 - by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro K4200 is 231 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 295.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K4200 is 4401 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	3−4	21−24
ultra / 1080p	2−3	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	14−16	40−45
medium / 1080p	5−6	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
high / 1080p	−	35−40
ultra / 1080p	7−8	30−33
QHD / 1440p	0−1	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	9−10
low / 720p	18−20	70−75
medium / 1080p	8−9	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Battlefield 5 is 327% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	30−35	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
low / 768p	120−130	230−240
medium / 768p	90−95	200−210
ultra / 1080p	40−45	120−130
QHD / 1440p	24−27	100−105
4K / 2160p	18−20	55−60
high / 768p	65−70	170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 141% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
low / 768p	80−85	60−65
ultra / 1080p	14−16	50−55
medium / 1080p	40−45	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
low / 768p	75−80	120−130
medium / 768p	50−55	110−120
ultra / 1080p	27−30	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Dota 2 is 105% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
high / 1080p	5−6	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
QHD / 1440p	−	20−22
4K / 2160p	2−3	8−9
low / 720p	14−16	55−60
medium / 1080p	6−7	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Far Cry 5 is 328% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
high / 1080p	12−14	35−40
ultra / 1080p	7−8	27−30
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
low / 720p	50−55	130−140
medium / 1080p	14−16	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Fortnite is 213% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
high / 1080p	7−8	35−40
ultra / 1080p	−	27−30
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	14−16
low / 720p	20−22	70−75
medium / 1080p	9−10	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 316% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
low / 768p	45−50	100−110
medium / 768p	−	95−100
high / 1080p	8−9	40−45
ultra / 1080p	5−6	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
medium / 720p	40−45	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 175% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
high / 1080p	3−4	14−16
ultra / 1080p	1−2	10−12
QHD / 1440p	−	10−12
4K / 2160p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	8−9	40−45
medium / 1080p	4−5	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Metro Exodus is 425% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
low / 768p	85−90	120−130
high / 1080p	85−90	−
ultra / 1080p	80−85	−
medium / 1080p	85−90	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Minecraft is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	27−30	75−80
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	7−8	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	8−9	40−45
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 225% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
low / 768p	16−18	80−85
medium / 768p	12−14	50−55
high / 1080p	6−7	27−30
ultra / 1080p	5−6	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 340% more, than GeForce GTX 295.
low / 768p	70−75	90−95
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	16−18	40−45
high / 768p	30−35	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in World of Tanks is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 295.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 295	Quadro K4200
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Kepler
Code name	GT200B	GK104
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	8 January 2009	22 July 2014
Pipelines	240	1344
Core clock speed	1242 MHz	771 MHz
Boost Clock		784 MHz
Transistor count	1,400 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	92.2 billion/sec	87.81
Floating-point performance	2x 596.2 gflops	2,107 gflops
Length	10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)	241 mm
Memory bus width	896 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	999 MHz	5400 MHz
Memory bandwidth	223.8 GB/s	172.8 GB/s
DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	4.0	5.1
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA	+	3.0
CUDA cores	480
Height	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options	+
Multi monitor support	+
HDMI	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		119 Mh/s
CUDA cores per GPU	240
Standard memory config per GPU	896 MB
Memory interface width per GPU	448 Bit
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)	128bit
		Check Price

GeForce GTX 295 vs Quadro K4200

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares